Letter

Published

Letter to VC on pension judgments

Details

Record no.
9840
Type
Letter
Published
From
DUTA
Categories

Full text


                                                                                         
The Vice Chancellor,
University of Delhi,
Delhi-110007.

26th May, 2014

Dear Prof Dinesh Singh, 

We note that the recent judgments of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the matter of conversion from CPF to GPF for Delhi University employees has been listed on the agenda for a special meeting of the Executive Council to be held on 27th May, 2014. The petitioners in these cases had been broadly categorized into three categories by the Hon’ble Single Bench as follows:-
Category I: Those who had exercised option of remaining in CPF only after the cut-off date i.e., 30.9.1987.
Category II: Those who had exercised option of continuing in CPF between 1.5.1987 and 30.9.1987.
Category III: Those who had never exercised any option of continuing in CPF either in the stipulated period 1.5.1987 -30.9.1987 or subsequent to the said cut-off date.

The judgments in the case of category I and III have brought relief to hundreds of  employees of Delhi University who have been struggling for several years for placement in the pension scheme, including some who have retired in this period. We appeal to you and to all members of the Executive Council, to accept these judgments and take immediate steps to implement them in all colleges and Departments of the University.

In this connection, we would like to enclose for your information a representation in this regard submitted to the UGC by the DUTA on 3.2.2014. The points raised by the DUTA appear to have been vindicated by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court.

We would also request the EC to appeal to the UGC to take a policy decision to give a 'one-time option' to those employees (in Category II) who have not got relief from the Hon’ble High Court, to enable them to come over to the Pension Scheme as well. There are only a few employees in this category, and the financial implications of the change will be negligible, as the CPF corpus in such cases would be recovered from them and can be utilized for payment of pension.
It may be noted that the Hon’ble High Court has not given any adverse decision against the 2469 employees who, as per University records, had exercised their option to come-over to the pension scheme after the cut-off date ie 30.9.1987and had been permitted to do so by the University. Most of these may already be in Category I or III (the exact figure can be ascertained from colleges/departments), and so the expenditure on this account would not be considered “unauthorized” as they would anyway have the right to pension as per the ruling of the Hon’ble High Court. For the small number remaining, the University should continue to protect their pension rights, which can be made more secure by seeking regularization of the expenditure from the UGC as a one-time measure, with an assurance that in the future, permission from the UGC will be sought before taking such decisions.

With regards,

Yours sincerely,


Nandita Narain                                                             Harish Khanna
(DUTA President)                                                      (DUTA Secretary)


https://duta.live

Cite this record

Delhi University Teachers’ Association. "Letter to VC on pension judgments." 26 May 2014. https://duta.live/2014/05/26/letter-to-vc-on-pension-judgments/.

Comments

2 comments

  1. Anonymous

    Task force has been asked to study only cases up to 31.03.1998. The University has completely forgotten the last option valid up to 31.01.1999. DUTA should take up their cases also. Those who retired after November 2010 have been denied Pension They are otherwise similarly placed as has been mentioned in the affidavit filed in the Court.THey are part of 2469. There are only 16 such cases. They have already released pension to about 70 such optees before November 2010. It is a clear case of disparity. DUTA should take up the matter with VC immediately as these cases are as old as 2010. They have neither got CPF nor Pension.
  2. Anonymous

    Task force has been asked to study only cases up to 31.03.1998. The University has completely forgotten the last option valid up to 31.01.1999. DUTA should take up their cases also. Those who retired after November 2010 have been denied Pension They are otherwise similarly placed as has been mentioned in the affidavit filed in the Court.THey are part of 2469. There are only 16 such cases. They have already released pension to about 70 such optees before November 2010. It is a clear case of disparity. DUTA should take up the matter with VC immediately as these cases are as old as 2010. They have neither got CPF nor Pension.